In the article
"Explosive growth in Asian cities: Bright ideas to Seize the Urban
Moment", Khanna (2015) claims that Asian cities are coping with rapid urbanisation
through innovative ideas. The writer asserts that compared to Europe and
America, Southeast Asia has more than twice the amount of people immigrating
into the cities from its rural areas. He argues that Southeast Asian
metropolises are managing rapid urban growth with flexible governance,
resourceful citizens and local infrastructure innovation. Ideas such as a
mobile application in Singapore called Beeline, this application adjusts
private bus routes based on its citizen’s demands. While in the Philippines,
the countryis providing more Wi-Fi hotspots to
its citizens. I support the writer’s view that Southeast Asia is having rapid
urbanisation compared to the rest of the world and adapting with relevant
ideas. However, I disagree on Khanna’s stand on how Southeast
Asian countries are tackling the main issue of rapid urbanisation growth
in spite of his stated innovative ideas.
Khanna himself states
that due to its increasing dense population and size, difficulties emerge to
provide essential necessities like housing, water and efficient transport
to support a large and growing population. Developing
countries will encounter various obstacles to managetheir increasing urban
populations in areas “such as housing, infrastructure, transportation, energy
and employment, education and health care”, (United Nations Department of
Economic and Social Affairs, 2014). Therefore, I strongly believe that
for a country to become an exemplary model in urban development in this era, it
must first be able to adhere to three basic necessities. These three basic
necessities are housing, water and efficient transport.
Such example of a
country adhering to these basic necessities is Philippines. The writer
emphasizes that in Manila, housing is a grave issue for its growing population.
He did not provide concrete examples on how Manila is tackling this with a
suitable innovative idea. The idea that the writer provides only tackles the
issue on cyberspace connectivity, which I strongly believe does not support any
basic necessities. A $1.2 billion USD mandate from the Philippine government
has been provided to clear up its polluted waterways in Manila Bay. This will
shift 104,000 families from the city’s many water towns surrounding Manila
Bay's water ways. The government plans to relocate these estimated 500,000
citizens into new structure developments in Manila. Under the mandate, the
Philippine government plans to create new residences which are able to shelter
900 families in them. (Hodal, 2013). The Philippine Government implemented a
mandate and this in turn has tackled two of its countries basic necessities,
housing and water, to support the country’s ever increasing population and
provide more water sources.
Another basic necessity,
transport, has been tackled by Singapore. Singapore plans to boost its already
densely populatednation up by another 30%.The
country has provided key planning ideas to adjust to this increased
growth. It plans on increasing rail network from 180km to 360km, twice its
current length, by 2030. This will allow more households to be able to access
the train services just a walkable distance from their homes (Ministry of Trade
and Industry Singapore, 2013). From this, we can clearly see how a Southeast
Asian country such as Singapore supports its growing population with a thorough
idea and tackles one of the key main necessities, transport. Instead of a
mobile app whereby Khanna provides as a form of innovative idea to tackle
Singapore’s transport demands which unfortunately lead to no coherent outcome.
This shows that the Singapore government has indirectly promoted its public
transport to its citizens by making the train services easily accessible to commuters.
Thus, providing efficient transport to its growing population
To conclude, the
innovative ideas provided by Khanna have substance but unfortunately there are
no direct outcomes when they are implemented. This does not show how itmakes Southeast Asian
countries exemplary to other countries of how they tackle their sudden urban
immigration growth, especially when the innovative idea does not cover direct
essential necessities which Khanna has stated are required to support a large
city population or even a basic city population. Nonetheless, I strongly agree
that Khanna is precise in implying that Southeast Asian countries are
experiencing a larger urban migration compared to the rest of the world and are
able to adapt with proper planning and ideas.
(718 Words)
References
MINISTRY OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY SINGAPORE. (2013). FAQs
on Population White
Hodal, K (2013).Manila
is a Hotbed of Progressive Housing Solutions A City’s Quest to Build a
UNITED NATIONS
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS. (2014).
World’s population
increasingly urban with more than half living in urban areas. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-urbanization-prospects.html